Saturday, April 18, 2020

So What Was THAT All About?



Yesterday, I went on a tone-deaf mini-rant that ended with a complaint about out-of-date shredded cabbage. After seeing several friends utilize online grocery ordering, I decided to try it out. The process with the shifting pickup dates and times was annoying but certainly manageable, and most of my order was fulfilled – I now have milk and avocados and apples and green peppers. Yay! But seeing the expired date on the bag of cabbage was, for me, a “last straw” trigger.

Cabbage? Really?



No, it's not the cabbage. Actually, it’s my students. My “A” day students to whom I taught the 1st steps of demand/supply theory on March 11, not knowing that would be the last day we would see each other. My “B” day students that sat and talked with me throughout the day on March 12, after the Governor’s order to not gather in groups larger than 250 people (Executive Order 20-05) scrapped our school’s planned Unity Day. Unity Day had been organized as an unprecedented day of rotating assemblies and discussion classes, and we received word 15 minutes into the 1st segment that we could not proceed. So instead, we reverted back to the “B” day class schedule, and students were unsettled. Frightened. Irritated. Angry. So we watched the news, and saw that on March 11, the World Health Organization had declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic. And we talked about what that might mean. And discussed whether school might be interrupted. One student, with great earnestness, asked “Mrs. McKee, does this mean Jesus is coming?” So then we talked about how, in the midst of any number of disasters or horrific events (Pearl Harbor, the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, 9/11, Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath, and so on), people have often wondered if the event was a signal of the end of the world, and what that looks like in different belief systems.
It’s my seniors, who have had the final 12 weeks of their school career ripped away from them. They’ll still graduate, of course. But schooling has abruptly stopped, and they are done. My students will not learn the basics of demand/supply theory. Government students will not participate in their mock legislature. I.B. students will not test. CE2 students will not complete their internships. There will be no prom. No band trip. No Winter Guard championship. No Dance Nationals. No state choir competition. No spring sports season. No senior sunset. And who knows what “graduation” will actually look like?


It’s my sister-in-law, who is on the front lines of fighting this pandemic in her position as an ER doctor at a major hospital in Portland. It’s my son-in-law’s sister, who works at one of the most impacted hospitals in New York City. 

 
It’s my former student who, as a person of Vietnamese ancestry, is dealing with ignorant people who treat her and other Asian-Americans with suspicion and hostility because they see all Asians as Chinese and they believe that COVID-19 is a virus that is passed on from Chinese people. 



It’s Governor Ron DeSantis reopening beaches in northern Florida just two weeks after issuing his month-long stay-at-home order, and the Floridians who rushed to sunbathe and play volleyball in defiance of the directive to engage only in activities like running, walking, or surfing.








 
It’s the growing number of people who are protesting the “tyranny” of government-ordered closures, carrying weapons and “Don’t Tread on Me” flags. People who do not understand that it is the appropriate function of government to protect the public, whether that protection comes in the form of traffic lights, zoning laws, licensing requirements for professions ranging from plumbers and electricians to teachers to physicians, chiropractors, and dentists, and so on. And now, in the midst of a global pandemic, it is the appropriate function of government to put restrictions in place that will mitigate the spread of the disease. These restrictions are rooted in the best available science, not in some conspiracy to take away “freedom”, using whatever definition one applies. 

 
It’s the incredible ineptitude of the current occupant of the White House, who appears to be stuck in perpetual prepubescence – caring most deeply about being the popular one who is adored by all, and caring very little about the vast human suffering that is happening all around him.  He continues to downplay the 700,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the US, including 13,000 deaths in New York City alone (April 18, 2020, Johns Hopkins University). Meanwhile, he called himself a “victim” during his April 16 call with the nation’s governors: "I was a victim of the first test, meaning I had to go through it. And I didn't like what was happening," Mr. Trump told the governors Thursday. "When they tell you, it goes up your nose and then they hang a right at your eye and it goes under your eye. And I say, 'You've gotta be kidding.'    And I called it an operation, not a test. I said, 'This is operation.'"   This self-labeling as a victim of a swab test comes 3 ½ weeks after calling himself a “war president”. 


It’s those who surround him, who fawningly refer in every response to “the President’s plan” each time they speak, to stroke his fragile ego.  Who look away when he make outrageous claims during his nightly briefings, but do not correct or challenge. Who, through their silence, give acquiescence to his rantings.  Who repeat, on various media platforms, his scientifically inaccurate statements as if they are factual. Who enable this emperor, who is completely without clothes.

 

One of the areas in which we have spent professional development time at my school is learning about the effects of trauma.  A concept with which we have become familiar is, for various reasons, when pressure has built up to a certain point, a person may “flip their lid”, during which they’ve basically just had enough. And later, when the lid is not flipped, more reasonableness comes back into the picture, and there is an opportunity for insight and reflection. But for some whose trauma is unrelenting, the lid seems to stay in a perpetual state of flipped-ness. That is the state for many right now.

Most everyone is experiencing their own version of trauma during this extraordinary time. It includes those of us who come from positions of privilege and are learning to navigate a new reality of working from home and shopping online, or seeing their children and grandchildren only through Portal or Zoom. It includes those school kids whose not-yet-completely-developed brains are struggling to absorb and process the abrupt changes to their lives. It includes those whose work is considered essential and are navigating how to stay safe as they meet the public or interact with coworkers. It includes those who are on the verge of losing their homes because of the sudden loss of what had always seemed like a very secure job. It includes those whose small business is the lifeline for not only themselves but for their employees. It includes those who are fighting for their lives or for the lives of others because of this virulent virus. And on, and on. Personally, my own trauma is small and my privilege is real. If out-of-date cabbage is what triggered my lid to flip, even for a brief moment, perhaps it was time to take inventory and see what is really bothering me.


It was never really about the cabbage.






Sources:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1k9gLrQP4adjP6hrd_03BXLtVkkDHSXps/view
  
https://www.foxnews.com/us/jacksonville-florida-beaches-reopen-coronavirus-phase-1

https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-guidelines-on-opening-up-america-leave-much-up-to-governors/



Monday, July 29, 2019

Look At The Facts


Brooklyn, NY. North Miami Beach, FL. Gilroy, CA.


What is the common factor here? All three of these communities were hit by gun violence this weekend. At festivals in Brooklyn and Gilroy. An apparent hate crime outside a synagogue in North Miami Beach. Festivals and a synagogue. The Brooklyn festival was at a playground. The Gilroy festival was at a park. Places of carefree fun and joy. And the North Miami Beach shooting was at a place of worship. All places where there should be no hint of violence.


In Brooklyn, a 38-year-old man died of a bullet to the head. 11 others were hospitalized, one in critical condition.


In North Miami Beach, a man in his 60s was shot four times from a passing car as he waited for evening services.


In Gilroy, 18 people were injured and three of them died. Among the dead was, reportedly, a six-year-old.


******************************************************

According to the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund, over 10,000 hate crimes annually in the United States involve a firearm. Yet, not all who are convicted of a hate crime are prohibited from buying or possessing guns.


*******************************************************

As of midnight PDT July 28, 2019, there have been 246 mass shootings in the US this year. Mass shooting is defined as 4 or more people shot during one incident. July 28 is the 170th day of the year. That is an average of 1.44 mass shootings per day in the US this year.


********************************************************


Whenever the topic of gun violence comes up, the focus quickly shifts to the sanctity of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. When the Constitution was adopted in 1789, the arms to which the Second Amendment referred were muskets and flintlock pistols, each of which held one round at a time. An expert musket shooter could attain a firing speed of up to three shots per minute, with a maximum accuracy range of 160 feet – a little over half the length of a football field. Compare the 1789 weapon with the popular Colt AR-15 rifle of today. An AR-15 has a magazine capacity of 30 rounds and a firing speed of up to 45 shots per minute, with a maximum accuracy range of 1800 feet – the length of six football fields laid end to end. Let’s look at those comparisons:


·         Musket
 

o   one round capacity

o   three shots per minute

o   maximum accuracy range of ½ football field

·         Colt AR-15

o   30 round capacity

o   45 shots per minute

o   maximum accuracy range of six football fields


It is not unfair to say that an angry 18th century musket owner would not have been able to shoot multiple people before being disarmed by those standing near. However, an angry 21st century AR-15 owner has the ability to shoot many people in a matter of minutes before those standing near have the opportunity to disarm them. (A witness to the Gilroy shooting reported hearing someone shout “Why are you doing this?” The reply was “Because I’m really angry.” CBS News)


I studied constitutional law as an undergraduate. I believe the US Constitution is among the most brilliant documents in the world. And one of the things that makes it so brilliant is the design that allows it to be changed - not in haste, but with thoughtfulness and deliberation. The US Constitution has been amended 27 times since its inception, and it is time for number 28. It is time for the Second Amendment to be changed, to acknowledge the immediate deadly force of modern weapons. Consider a previous controversial change: In 1865, we amended the Constitution to recognize what many knew to be a fundamental truth, that no one may hold another as a slave in this country. Please understand, not everyone was in favor of the Thirteenth Amendment, and there was a great deal of dismay and dissent. No matter – the change was made, and the country was (and is) better for it. In a similar manner, we must change the Constitution to reflect the monumental difference between the arms of the late 1700s and modern weaponry. This change can be done in such a manner as to insure the legal right of firearms ownership by law-abiding people, while putting regulations in place that will require secondary market background checks and providing a uniform waiting period for the purchase of a handgun. These changes will not be perfect - some will find ways around the regulations. But it will affect the impulse purchases of handguns (which experts agree will have the additional benefit of a positive effect on suicide rates), and it will make it more difficult for those with a history of violence to acquire firearms. Law-abiding people will not be adversely affected by these changes.

Will this upset some people? Yes. Will some consider this to be a governmental over-reach? Yes. Will some believe that Constitutional changes such as these will violate their individual rights? Yes. Do these objections matter? No.


Your right to own a gun is not of greater importance than a six-year-old’s right to be alive. Period.







References:










**Edited for accuracy after law enforcement announcement regarding victims.