Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Black Lives Matter, Marxism, and Confirmation Bias

As I was walking as part of my cool-down after my run this morning I passed by a person who was chatting with a worker from a nearby construction site. The worker was very animated in his talking, practically shouting "They're admitted Marxists! They're all f**king Communists!"

I assume this worker was referring to the Black Lives Matter movement, which was started in 2013 after the acquittal of the person who killed Trayvon Martin. One of the co-founders said in an interview in 2015 that she and one of the other co-founders are "trained Marxists", during the discussion of the backgrounds of the people who started the organization.

So what does that mean? What it DOES mean is that one or perhaps two of the founding members of Black Lives Matter have studied Marxism and identifies as Marxist. What is DOES NOT mean is that BLM is a Marxist organization. Think of it like this analogy: let's say a person who studied the catechism and identifies as a Catholic decides to open a restaurant with some partners, one of whom periodically attends Mass. What that means is that one, or perhaps two, of the owners are Catholic. That DOES NOT mean the restaurant is a Catholic business, or that the workers are all Catholic, or that the customers are Catholic, specifically. Or Christian, in general. It DOES mean that at least one of the owners studied Catholicism, and is probably influenced in their personal life by those teachings.  

The idea that BLM is a "Marxist organization" was expressed in a Facebook post from a group called PragerU that featured a video in which a former professor discussed the 2015 interview, pointing out the conversation regarding Marxism by one of the founders. In looking at PragerU as a source, it is important to note that PragerU calls itself "Prager University", but is not a university nor any type of institute of higher education. At the bottom of their front page is this line: "Prager University is not an accredited academic institution and does not offer certifications or diplomas. But it is a place where you are free to learn". PragerU is a forum written by a self-described conservative talk-show host and his producer/writer.

A good place to check out the veracity of internet statements is PolitiFact, which gathers its information from a wide range of sources. In checking out this Facebook allegation, PolitiFact cites sources ranging from the Hoover Institute (Stanford University) to Brietbart to the New York Times to the Foundation for Economic Education, and more. Their short take? 

  •  Black Lives Matter was founded by community organizers. One of the three co-founders said in 2015 that she and another co-founder “are trained Marxists.”
  •  Black Lives Matters has grown into a national anti-racism movement broadly supported by Americans, few of whom would identify themselves as Marxist. (7/21/2020 – PolitiFact)

Want to know more? I’ve included the links to the PolitiFact article, and to the Black Lives Matter website. In my experience, checking out information from primary sources and trusted research sites is always preferable to simply accepting what I read in a post, even if it is a post made by someone I like and with whom I agree. Always sticking with information from like-minded people and organizations leads to something called “confirmation bias”, which is defined by Lexico/Oxford as “the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories”. Although it is more comforting to sit with information that doesn't challenge one's beliefs, it is vitally important to search out accurate facts when trying to determine the accuracy of information. An article published in Psychology Today states "Disconfirming instances are far more powerful in establishing the truth" (Shahram Heshmat, Ph.D., University of Illinois – 4/23/2015 – Psychology Today)

Black Lives Matter is not a Marxist organization, nor are those who associate with it Communists. Black Lives Matter “is not an organization, but a fluid movement; it doesn’t actually matter if one of its founders was a liberal, Marxist, socialist or capitalist." (Miriyam Aouragh, Westminster School of Media and Communication, London – 7/21/2020 - PolitiFact)



PolitiFact article

Black Lives Matter website

Psychology Today article

Lexico/Oxford definition

Friday, June 12, 2020

HOW To Discuss


Some may be wondering why I gave a shout-out to the King City Police for their help today. I am always glad to see especially a small municipality choose to allocate their resources in ways that are helpful, and providing food to those who are in need and cannot go out is a great service. So, thanks for that decision, King City. 





You who know me know I am a social scientist and one thing that we social scientists really like is civil discourse. It turns out that my shout-out to the King City Police generated a pretty lively discussion, which is not really surprising, given the current social climate. For social scientists, when everyone doesn't agree - we're ok with that. So what I would like to do is talk about HOW to discuss things about which there is disagreement.



When I am teaching my students how to discuss controversial issues, there are rules. (When I explain the rules, I use first-person examples.) One of the rules is that no one gets to discount the experience of another. And that includes “whataboutism”. That’s when someone says something, and I reply with “yes, but what about…”. Nope. What is appropriate is for me to say “I am sorry that happened to you”. Or “that must have been tough”. Or “that sounds like a difficult situation”. Or, maybe to not say anything, and to ponder what the other person has said.



Another rule is that, as a white woman of privilege, I do not get to talk over a person of color when they are discussing their reality. So that means I do not talk over Jarra. And I do not talk over Eddie. Even though I have nieces who are women of color. And even though I have friends who are POC. And even though I have students who are POC. And even if I have gone out of my way to become educated and well-read. I still will never know what their experience is. Why? Because I cannot experience it myself. Now, please understand I am not talking about empathy. Yes, I can learn to empathize. But I cannot ever KNOW their experience. So it is not my place to tell them what is really so. I can speak to what I know personally, but I cannot speak to what they know. And what I know does not negate what they know.



Everyone is at a different place in their journey, and everyone’s journey is influenced by their experiences. I grew up with a father who worked as a police detective. He helped put people in prison who bilked old folks out of their life’s savings. He helped Southeast Asian immigrants in Portland keep their businesses afloat when they were being threatened by organized crime protection rackets. He investigated robberies and murders. So that is often the lens through which I have seen the police. But that is also my lens of being a white woman of privilege, who has never been threatened or violated by the police. We are seeing a much more militaristic and reactive police culture now than that in which my dad worked. The training is very different than when he used to teach at the police academy. And POC are disproportionately arrested and imprisoned. According to the UN, in 2016 27% of arrests in the US were of Black individuals, while the Black population of the US was 13%. Black and Hispanic Americans make up 29% of the overall population, but are 59% of the US prison population. These are just two statistics that are indicative of the huge systemic problem with race and American policing, and we haven't even looked at the historic role of policing and the Black community. This is the crux of the outcry against policing in the US. In the discussion thread on my post, Eddie says that by saying ACAB “we are not referring to the Person who is the cop. Cop is not an identity, it’s a uniform that a person chooses to put on every day. And with that choice comes complicity in a system that is BUILT on the oppression of Black bodies. So no, your uncle Steve who’s a cop isn’t a bad guy, but by being a cop he is choosing the side of the oppressor…”. Food for thought. Challenging concepts. Ideas for discussion. But not for “whataboutism”. And not for “my dad was a cop, and so I am an expert”. Or “I know Black people, and so I can speak for them”. And not "but not all cops..." Nope.

So, my request is that those who choose to post on my page follow the rules that I feel are important. And if you are not comfortable with my rules, feel free to post on another page. 



Tuesday, June 9, 2020

THE BLESSING - LEBANON

My friend Roula, a teacher who lives is Beirut, shared this video blessing that was created by musicians from a number of faith groups in Lebanon. Singers include Roula, her husband Bassem, and their daughter and son Samantha and Brandon.

These inclusive words are resonating with me today:


May His presence go before you
And behind you, and beside you
All around you, and within you
He is with you, He is with you

In the morning, in the evening
In your coming, and your going
In your weeping, and rejoicing
He is for you, He is for you

He is for you, He is for you
He is for you, He is for you
He is for you, He is for you


God is for you. Amen.